Executive report preview

Recruitment Intelligence Review

eipaw

These insights are AI-assisted and expert-guided. They are designed to support better recruitment conversations, not replace human judgement.

Executive summary

Functional recruitment performance with high commercial opportunity.

eipaw appears to have a recruitment health score of 50/100 and an estimated annual leakage of £1,341,900. The review should focus on reduce decision latency and then validate the priority risks with leadership.

AI can process information quickly. Experience knows what matters. This report combines AI-assisted analysis with human-led recruitment insight.

Health score

50/100

Maturity

Developing

Leakage

£1,341,900

Cost leakage breakdown

Early attrition£196,900
Agency spend£25,000
Failed hires£141,800
Manager delay£116,800
Vacancy delays£739,900
Offer rejection£121,500

Priority recommendations

Recommendations are intelligence-led and expert-guided, intended to sharpen the next recruitment conversation.

Reduce Decision Latency

Slow hiring compounds vacancy cost and makes strong candidates more likely to accept elsewhere.

Action: Set clear stage ownership, introduce weekly hiring standups, and cap feedback windows at 48 hours.

Reduce Agency Dependence

High agency reliance is expensive and often signals a weak direct attraction or planning model.

Action: Segment agency use by role difficulty, build direct sourcing lists, and reserve agencies for true specialist searches.

Introduce a Manager Hiring Framework

Manager delay is one of the fastest ways to lose candidate momentum and inflate vacancy cost.

Action: Give managers a simple hiring SLA, role briefing template, and feedback scorecard.

Consultant dashboard